Serving the GW Community since 1904

The GW Hatchet


The GW Hatchet

Serving the GW Community since 1904

The GW Hatchet

Sign up for our twice-weekly newsletter!

Wine bar on 2200 Penn opens doors
By Ella Mitchell, Contributing News Editor • June 14, 2024

What you need to know about the controversy surrounding GW Hospital’s East End facility

Hatchet File Photo
In recent weeks, discussions about the GW Hospital’s plans to open a new hospital in Southeast D.C. have reached a boiling point.

In recent weeks, discussions about the GW Hospital’s plans to open a new hospital in Southeast D.C. have reached a boiling point.

The plan has garnered backlash from community leaders, while D.C. Council members have thrown their support behind amended legislation expediting the new facility’s opening. But as of Thursday, GW Hospital halted negotiations with the city to operate the new hospital – and the entire agreement is up in the air.

It may be confusing to follow the ins and outs of the new plan, which put down roots two years ago and has picked up speed over the past few weeks. If you haven’t followed the latest developments, here is a timeline of all facets of the plan:

June 2016: Hospital board approves plans for new facility
The Board of Directors for United Medical Center, a nonprofit community hospital run by the District that is located on Southern Avenue in Southeast D.C., voted to approve a “site selection study” to build a new hospital east of the Anacostia River. The board planned to make a decision on the new site and begin construction in August of that year, DCist reported.

September 2017: Mayor Bowser announces new site location
After UMC’s Board of Directors completed the study to determine where the new East End facility would be located, Mayor Muriel Bowser announced that the new medical facility would be constructed on the St. Elizabeths East campus in Congress Heights, The Washington Business Journal reported.

Aug. 10, 2018: GW to manage new hospital
Bowser announced that the East End facility would be managed and run by GW Hospital and the GW Medical Faculty Associates, a group made up of faculty in the School of Medicine and Health Sciences.

Bowser said the new hospital is expected to open in 2023 and will house about 100 hospital beds.

The District has allocated $300 million for the new hospital, and GW Hospital is expected to contribute at least $75 million for the project over the next 10 years, according to the letter of intent signed by both GW Hospital and the city.

Sept. 18, 2018: D.C. Council attempts to help expedite process
Members of the D.C. Council introduced the East End Health Equity Act of 2018, a bill that would exempt GW Hospital from the Certification of Need process – a set of regulations that requires the State Health Planning and Development Agency to determine if a project is a public need.

The piece of legislation said the purpose of the bill is to “expeditiously move forward with creating a comprehensive, integrated health care system that equitable serves all residents in the District of Columbia.”

The act includes the construction of a new 270-bed tower at GW Hospital – something the hospital asked for when it agreed to run the East End facility – and bypass the Certification of Need process to open the new hospital in 2021, two years ahead of schedule.

Oct. 18, 2018: Local advisory group opposes project for new Foggy Bottom tower
The Foggy Bottom and West End Advisory Neighborhood Commission, a local governing group, unanimously passed a resolution opposing the act after representatives of GW Hospital and the D.C. Council presented to the group.

ANC Chairman William Kennedy Smith said the bill was the “worst piece of legislative crafting” he had seen because the D.C. Council Committee on Health did not notify Jack Evans – the Council member who represents Ward 2, which includes Foggy Bottom – or notify the University before the bill was introduced.

Nov. 5, 2018: Foggy Bottom residents voice opposition
About 30 Foggy Bottom residents met with ANC members to voice their opposition to the new bed tower at GW Hospital, citing concerns that the required construction and the new facilities would increase ambulance traffic and disrupt pedestrians near the tower.

Commissioner Patrick Kennedy said the project would leave GW with an “inflation-causing building in Foggy Bottom” in the future.

Residents also expressed concerns that adding beds and specialized care at GW Hospital would negatively impact Howard University Hospital, which is the primary provider for care in Southeast D.C.

Howard University President Wayne A.I. Frederick told The Washington Post last month that competition from the addition of the new tower would force Howard’s hospital to shut down because patients will go to Foggy Bottom for specialized care.

Nov. 20, 2018: ANC continues to push back
ANC commissioners unanimously passed a second resolution condemning the bill.

Smith, the ANC’s chairman, said GW had recently sent the ANC a letter criticizing the construction of the tower. The resolution praised the University’s “thoughtful plan for the future of the University’s health care-related activities.”

Nov. 30, 2018: D.C. Council modifies the legislation
The D.C. Council announced it would amend the bill by proposing a 220-bed tower instead of the 270-bed structure that was initially suggested. The extra 50 beds that were scrapped from the GW Hospital tower would be added to the East End facility.

University spokeswoman Lindsay Hamilton told the Washington City Paper Nov. 29 that GW is supportive of the new East End facility, but “the University does not support the construction of an additional bed tower on the Foggy Bottom Campus.”

Dec. 6, 2018: D.C. Council makes concessions
The D.C. Council passed four amendments intended to address concerns from the bill’s opponents. Two of the amendments reduced the new tower to 220 beds and prioritized the construction of the new facility in Southeast.

Councilmember Elissa Silverman introduced a third amendment to protect unionized nurses and medical technicians at UMC with a bargaining agreement to ensure that employees could transfer to the new facility and receive the same labor protections they had at the previous facility.

Councilmember Trayon White also proposed an amendment establishing a partnership between GW and Howard University hospitals to sustain Howard’s facility because many patients will be redirected to GW Hospital for specialized care when the new bed tower opens.

Councilmember Vincent Gray called the latter two amendments a “poison pill” that endangered the success of the agreement.

The D.C. Council tabled the bill for a final vote at its next meeting on Dec. 18.

Dec. 7, 2018: GW Hospital halts negotiations
GW Hospital suspended negotiations with the District to build and run the East End facility after sending a letter to city officials that the D.C. Council’s amendments “have made our continued participation potentially impossible and placed this project in jeopardy.”

More to Discover
Donate to The GW Hatchet